APHSA website banner AFFILIATE - Association of Administrators of the Interstate Compact on the Placement of Children (AAICPC) AFFILIATE - American Association of Food Stamp Directors (AAFSD) AFFILIATE - American Association of Public Welfare Attorneys - this affiliate does not have a website at this time! AFFILIATE - Center for Workers with Disabilities AFFILIATE - IT Solutions Management for Human Services AFFILIATE - National Association of Public Child Welfare Administrators (NAPCWA) AFFILIATE - National Association of State Child Care Administrators (NASCCA) - this affiliate does not have a website at this time! AFFILIATE - National Association of State Medicaid Directors (NASMD) AFFILIATE - National Staff Development and Training Association (NSDTA) Click here to be taken to www.aphsa.org's homepage! Click here to get to www.aphsa.org's homepage! AFFILIATE - National Association for Program Information and Performance Measurement (NAPIPM)
Printer Friendly Page

 

Log in

Donate Now

Youth in Transition to Adulthood

Advertise in Policy & Practice

Advertise in APHSA's Human Services News Clipping Service

Check out APHSA's Conference Calendar




PPCWI

Jerry's Blogging Site

APHSA's Mailing List Rental Information

Policy and Practice magazine

Directory 2009

APHSA's online gift shop


Site Tools

search iconSearch APHSA

Type KeyWord in the box below and hit Enter

printer icon Print Page

bookmark icon

textsize iconResize Text

Increases font sizeReverts to document default size
Decreases font Size

sitemap tool bar iconSite Map

This Week in Washington

TWIW Sneak Peek

6/26/2009, Vol. XXX, No. 23

Senate HELP Committee Suspends Health Care Markup Until Next Month
On June 24, the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee suspended markup of its health overhaul markup, a day and a half earlier than planned. Acting Chairman Christopher J. Dodd (D-Conn.) said the panel will reconvene the drafting session July 6, with the goal of completing it by July 10. The Congressional Budget Office scored the plan as reducing the uninsured population by just 16 million at a 10-year cost of $1 trillion, and the plan has been criticized by Republicans as incomplete and too costly. Dodd cited incomplete scoring of long-term care provisions as the reason for suspending the committee’s work; the session was originally set to run through June 26 before reconvening after the July Fourth recess.

Before adjourning, the committee approved two amendments by Ranking Member Michael Enzi (R-Wyo.), one of which would ensure that the secretary of Health and Human Services conducts workplace wellness evaluations of publicly funded programs before evaluating privately funded programs. Dodd told committee members that he expected to get them the language shortly that deals with the unaddressed provisions, including creation of a public plan and “pay or play” mandates that would penalize employers who did not offer coverage. Earlier this week, committee hearings focused on preventative care and the health care workforce. Dodd hopes the panel will have numbers on how to cover the uninsured and pay for the proposals after the July recess. Republicans have offered some 200 amendments to the proposed legislation.

Meanwhile, Senate Finance Committee Chair Max Baucus (D-Mont.) said he has developed language that would reduce the price tag of his plan to about $1 trillion over 10 years and gain bipartisan support. Baucus and his committee had been working closely with the Congressional Budget Office to trim the cost of the proposal. Although the committee did not release details of the plan, it did release some information on what will be included. The bill proposes capping the tax exclusion for employer-sponsored benefits; giving more power to the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission—an outside body that sets Medicare payment rates—while allowing Congress to overturn the recommendations; and replacing the controversial public plan option with a consumer-owned “co-op” plan. The plan does not include a mandate on businesses to provide health care insurance. Employers would not have to provide coverage under the proposal, but there would be pressures on them to do so. They would have to contribute to the cost of covering workers on Medicaid and those who got coverage in the subsidized insurance exchange. In return, workers would be allowed to leave their employer-provided insurance only if the coverage available through their jobs was unaffordable.

Other Articles in This Issue:


To access all the articles, please log in with your username and password. If you do not have one, please subscribe to TWIW.


If you are already a member and are unable to get to the issue, your subscription may have expired. For both these cases; please contact Parthenia Purnell at 202-682-0100 x276 or parthenia.purnell@aphsa.org

User Name  

Password